Complementing the earlier session on written memorials, this workshop turned to the craft of oral advocacy the moment, in the presenter’s words, a student “transforms into a shield for their client.” Framed around the Rwandan concept of Agaciro (dignity and self-worth), the session guided participants through four pillars of courtroom persuasion.
The first, mastery of the record, treated the compromis as the advocate’s Bible: knowing the facts better than the bench builds credibility, defends against “trap” questions, and neutralises bad facts before opponents can exploit them. The second, structural precision, presented argument as a map a strong tripartite opening, disciplined signposting, the IRAC/CRAC rhythm, the “even if” alternative plea, and a firm closing prayer for relief. The third, strategic flexibility, prepared students for the “hot bench” through the Answer-First rule, the Bridge-and-Pivot technique, well-timed concessions, and reading whether a bench is “cold” or “hot.” The fourth, style and decorum, addressed the “aura of gravitas” voice modulation and the power of the pause, steady eye contact, controlled physicality, formal courtroom language, and the composed rebuttal that corrects rather than attacks.
The session closed with a reminder that an advocate stands not to win an argument but to assist the court in the pursuit of justice “do not just speak, advocate; do not just argue, persuade” supported by a practical cheat sheet of openings, transitions, question-handling, and closings.
